Union Endorsement of BOE Candidate Not an Automatic Conflict
An individual served as a board of education member for an initial term. During his candidacy for reelection, the local education association and statewide education association decided to endorse the individual. The individual was reelected. Is this a conflict of interest and a violation of the School Ethics Act? Not necessarily, said the School Ethics Commission (“SEC”) in Advisory Opinion A10-18 issued on June 26, 2018.
The local education association (“LEA”) offered financial support to the individual, which he did not accept. On its own accord, the New Jersey Education Association (“NJEA”) circulated printed material endorsing the individual’s candidacy. The individual serves on the board of education’s negotiations team. He also received notice that the LEA President may file a lawsuit against him.
In its advisory opinion, the SEC explained that a local and/or statewide union’s endorsement of a candidate does not automatically create a future conflict unless financial contribution is given and is intended to influence the individual in the discharge of his duties as a board member. Legitimate political activity by itself does not violate the School Ethics Act and does not per se create a conflict.
Based on the individual’s circumstances, the SEC found that the board member in question did not have an automatic conflict. The SEC cautioned the board member to not surrender his independent judgment to any special interest group. The SEC also advised that if the LEA President initiates a lawsuit against him, he should recuse himself from any matter related to the LEA.
Connect with Capehart Scatchard